I think you are bluffing.
harry On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Andrew <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > It's a capacitor in parallel with a resistor. I am underwhelmed. > > Andrew > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Harry Veeder <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:55 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Spice model explains eCat non-exponential waveform, > supports David Roberson's linear-response theory > > > The diagram reminds me of constructions consisting of springs and dashpots > in series and parallel which are used to model viscoelastic materials. > see e.g. > > http://gertrude-old.case.edu/276/materials/5.fig/05.htm6.gif > http://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0023643808000790-gr1.jpg > > His circuit diagram could be considered an electric model of force > interaction at the atomic scale within the Ecat's fuel. > > > > > harry > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Andrew <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ** >> Let's make sure I understand these 4 plots. I understand your diagram >> thus: >> >> The blue square wave goes through your toy model and emerges as the >> green double exponential. >> The blue triangular wave goes through your toy model and emerges as the >> green curve that looks very like the power curve in the report. >> The toy model describes a thermal simulation which translates electrical >> input to the device to radiant power output. >> >> OK so far? >> >> Assuming yes, here's what I think you've shown. The control box consumes >> power as a square wave (which is what the report measures on the input >> side), and outputs a triangular wave to the device. The device's output >> power profile (radiant heat) comes out as per the report. Bazinga. >> >> The only problem is that the cable between the control box and the device >> contains "secrets". That's your next reverse-engineering mission :) >> >> Andrew >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Alan Fletcher" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:37 PM >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Spice model explains eCat non-exponential waveform, >> supports David Roberson's linear-response theory >> >> >> From: "Andrew" <[email protected]> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 4:53:45 PM >> >> That's a nice piece of reverse engineering - Kudos. My only issue >> >> with it is >> >> the plot in the report, which definitely shows square waves. Mind >> >> you, these >> >> were measured on the input side of the control box. So it's possible >> >> you've uncovered a secret about the actual drive waveform. >> > >> > The square waves are the INPUT stimulus. The wavy line (eg plot 8) is >> the OUTPUT power. >> > >> > But the general shape will be similar. >> > >> > (I displayed voltage ... equivalent to temperature. I still have lots >> to do. >> > >> > >
