On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Andrew <[email protected]> wrote: > > ** >> Oh, and I haven't seen any links to videos. Any chance you could post >> them again? Is this cheese power, perchance? If so, I've seen them, and I >> have a theory about how they're done. Should I give that out? >> > > I already sussed it out. It's in a set of comments and replies with > Tinsel Koala. > > Regardless of how it's done, or whether Rossi used the same method, the demonstration is very nice illustration that meters can be fooled quite easily when there is a little infrastructure to hide things, and that when an extraordinary claim like cheese-power is made, the assumption immediately falls to trickery, even if the trickery is not understood. True believers insist on an explanation of how deception might explain the alleged observations, but do not hold themselves to the same standard to give an explanation for how NiH could produce 100 times the power density of nuclear fuel without melting. It would be easy for anyone with elementary knowledge of electricity to set up an experiment to demonstrate cheese-power unequivocally, if it were real. Likewise, the same could be done for the ecat. But when they use 3-phase, when single would do, when the wiring is in place ahead of time, when close associates chose the instruments which are completely inadequate, when the blank run uses different conditions, when the input timing is determined from a video tape, and when the claim is as unlikely as cheese-power, it is ok to be suspicious.
