Dear Bill, Please bring Abd back! He knows a lot LENR and his unique error was answering to a nasty troll. Peter
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:14 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]>wrote: > I agree with DaveR… **** > > ** ** > > Andrew and Duncan had only been actively contributing (and yes, mostly > useful) for a week or two and the insults and snide remarks had already > started... not one, but several. That is not disputable…**** > > ** ** > > BOTH parties could be right, and the difference is in a misunderstanding > of what the other party was proposing. Dave based his position on what he > knows to be sound engineering principles and built a Spice model which > verifies his understanding. He asked them to do the same. They leveled > more insults and did not produce a model to support their position. Both > are EEs and should have been able to build a Spice model in minutes. I > still think that one was talking apples and the other oranges, and the > comparison of models would have revealed the differences and settled the > matter. They chose to be arrogant and disrespectful; Dave maintained a > respectful tone the entire time… easy, and correct decision by Bill.**** > > ** ** > > I too would welcome them back provided they build the spice model, then > they exchange models and report back as to either an error in the model, or > that there are differences in the models which would explain why the > disagreement.**** > > ** ** > > -Mark Iverson**** > > ** ** > > *From:* David Roberson [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 29, 2013 2:52 PM > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:MODERATOR: andrewppp removed**** > > ** ** > > Jed, I vote to keep him off for a while. Perhaps you missed his insults > toward me and others on the list.**** > > **** > > What I find particularly funny is that he did not even realize that what I > stated was true! If he eventually makes that spice model that I begged him > and his friend Duncan to do, he might want to apologize. I built a model > in less than 15 minutes that showed my position was completely valid.**** > > **** > > A cooling off period might change his attitude. How about a condition > attached to his return:Build and test that spice model.**** > > **** > > Dave**** > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Wed, May 29, 2013 4:04 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:MODERATOR: andrewppp removed**** > > William Beaty <[email protected]> wrote:**** > > **** > > multiple violations of rule 2. > > (I suspect that he didn't read the rules before subscribing.)**** > > ** ** > > Whoa! That seems precipitous. He did not seem so bad to me.**** > > ** ** > > > Rule 2. NO SNEERING. Ridicule, derision, scoffing, and ad-hominem is > banned. Debunking or "Pathological Skepticism" is banned (see the link.) > The tone here should be one of legitimate disagreement and respectful > debate. . . . > > http://www.amasci.com/weird/wvort.html#rules > > > Perhaps you can invite him back after a bit? Also maybe Abd? I miss him.** > ** > > ** ** > > They might not swallow their pride and return. Maybe you should say "I > acted too hastily, I apologize." Say this whether you mean it or not. > That's how they do things in Japan.**** > > ** ** > > - Jed**** > > ** ** > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
