I support him back. He is a a man of peace and understanding abd was defending the religion of his and his friends.
2013/5/30 Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> > Dear Bill, > Please bring Abd back! He knows a lot LENR > and his unique error was answering to a nasty > troll. > Peter > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:14 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net>wrote: > >> I agree with DaveR… **** >> >> ** ** >> >> Andrew and Duncan had only been actively contributing (and yes, mostly >> useful) for a week or two and the insults and snide remarks had already >> started... not one, but several. That is not disputable…**** >> >> ** ** >> >> BOTH parties could be right, and the difference is in a misunderstanding >> of what the other party was proposing. Dave based his position on what he >> knows to be sound engineering principles and built a Spice model which >> verifies his understanding. He asked them to do the same. They leveled >> more insults and did not produce a model to support their position. Both >> are EEs and should have been able to build a Spice model in minutes. I >> still think that one was talking apples and the other oranges, and the >> comparison of models would have revealed the differences and settled the >> matter. They chose to be arrogant and disrespectful; Dave maintained a >> respectful tone the entire time… easy, and correct decision by Bill.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> I too would welcome them back provided they build the spice model, then >> they exchange models and report back as to either an error in the model, or >> that there are differences in the models which would explain why the >> disagreement.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> -Mark Iverson**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 29, 2013 2:52 PM >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:MODERATOR: andrewppp removed**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Jed, I vote to keep him off for a while. Perhaps you missed his insults >> toward me and others on the list.**** >> >> **** >> >> What I find particularly funny is that he did not even realize that what >> I stated was true! If he eventually makes that spice model that I begged >> him and his friend Duncan to do, he might want to apologize. I built a >> model in less than 15 minutes that showed my position was completely valid. >> **** >> >> **** >> >> A cooling off period might change his attitude. How about a condition >> attached to his return:Build and test that spice model.**** >> >> **** >> >> Dave**** >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Wed, May 29, 2013 4:04 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:MODERATOR: andrewppp removed**** >> >> William Beaty <bi...@eskimo.com> wrote:**** >> >> **** >> >> multiple violations of rule 2. >> >> (I suspect that he didn't read the rules before subscribing.)**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Whoa! That seems precipitous. He did not seem so bad to me.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> >> Rule 2. NO SNEERING. Ridicule, derision, scoffing, and ad-hominem is >> banned. Debunking or "Pathological Skepticism" is banned (see the link.) >> The tone here should be one of legitimate disagreement and respectful >> debate. . . . >> >> http://www.amasci.com/weird/wvort.html#rules >> >> >> Perhaps you can invite him back after a bit? Also maybe Abd? I miss him.* >> *** >> >> ** ** >> >> They might not swallow their pride and return. Maybe you should say "I >> acted too hastily, I apologize." Say this whether you mean it or not. >> That's how they do things in Japan.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> - Jed**** >> >> ** ** >> > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
