Why expect 2-phase customisation for a relatively low-priority scientific
experiment? 3-phase design make sense in the context of the concurrent
high-priority finalisation, testing and shipping of a purported 1 MW device,
which at a claimed COP of 6 would need an electrical input of 167 KW.

 

Incidentally, these "shipping" photos supplied by Rossi appear to show Levi
and the test setup (and the presence of an armed security guard):
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/05/e-cat-shipping-pictures-posted-on-the-jonp
/

 

Charles

 

From: Joshua Cude [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 30 May 2013 19:38
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:new hypothesis to confute regarding input energy in Ecat
test

 

.... The 3-phase looks more like obfuscation to me.

 

 

 

Reply via email to