No problem, I will meet you here in a couple of years and we can compare notes. Sorry if it came out patronizing, perhaps I was getting a little out of hand due to being inundated with so many unsupported claims. I assure you that I can speak to any of the objections that you have provided they are not totally out of reality.
Lets start with one of your choice regarding the many heat generation issues. How about how a small amount of heat can control a much larger amount? Are you interesting in an explanation or do you want to keep stating things that can be shown wrong? Or, how about my favorite recent issue about how DC flowing due to rectification in the load makes the input power measurement inaccurate since it leaves out the RMS value of the DC current? This one is easy to prove wrong. Lets start there, OK? And if you now realize that what I have being saying about the DC is true then at least admit it even though your friends might not like what you are saying. Lets at least put this one issue to bed and off the table. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Joshua Cude <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, May 31, 2013 1:43 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ethics of the E-Cat investigation put into question On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:37 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: It is great to see that we are in such close agreement. Let's handle the issues related to positive feedback as I requested and you will improve your understanding. I thought you were keeping an open mind, not a patronizing one that is certain it is in possession of received wisdom. By the way, a long time ago you promised I'd see the truth about the validity of the old steam cats real soon now. How is it that they never got validated and now are abandoned? If 2 more years pass, and this hot cat configuration is abandoned, what will you say then. I'll be here to check up.
