On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Cude has waved his hands and said there might be a method of deception > that he has not thought of yet. As I have often pointed out, such > assertions cannot be tested or falsified. There might be an error in Ohm's > law we have not yet discovered, but until you specify what that error > actually is, you have no basis for arguing that law may be wrong. Ah, so it's OK to argue that Cude is, in effect, hand-waving away Ohm's law and that's indefensible because that law is accepted but it's not OK to argue that Carat's dismissal of conventional physics as being wrong about LENR is also hand waving? [m]
