On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> LENR complies with all know physical laws. The problem is that few > scientists have a background in this new branch of science. > You don't know what you're talking about. LENR is contrary to predictions based on a century of copious, reproducible experimental results which fit a highly consistent and robust picture. That doesn't mean it's wrong, as history shows; it means the evidence for it must be as consistent and robust as the evidence that predicts it's wrong before it will be taken seriously. At present, there is no consistent evidence for it at all.
