My complements to Duncan for stepping up to the plate and taking time to do this. and of course to Dave Roberson for making the model in the first place.
Thank you Dave/Duncan! -Mark Iverson From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 7:22 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]: DC Meter Cheat Spice Model to be Replicated I have good news to report. My hypothesis is that DC current generated by load rectification and thus flowing through the input AC sine wave power source (3 phase input to Rossi's ECAT) does not result in the stealing of any power from that source. Also, any second and higher order harmonic currents flowing through that source will not effect the measured, calculated and actual power being delivered by that sine wave source. I have a simple world view of this process where all of the power being delivered from the sine source can be determined uniquely by observing the sine wave current and voltage at the fundamental frequency of that source. This understanding is in line with the instrument measurements performed during Rossi's latest testing. Some of the critics have raised questions about the validity of my hypothesis so I constructed a simple spice model which confirmed my understanding. I have requested that Cude or any others interested in finding the truth construct a similar model and prove me wrong. This request has remained unanswered until yesterday when Duncan (who proposed the DC stealing concept) agreed to perform a replication. We are currently agreeing upon the setup and how to confirm which hypothesis is accurate. This is admirable of Duncan and I want to offer my appreciation to him for being open minded and willing to prove something of importance. His position is far removed from that of Cude who talks but never performs. I promise to post the results of this replication attempt on this list once it has been completed. No matter what the outcome, the data will be shown in a fair and open manner. This will allow anyone harboring additional questions an opportunity to seek clarification. This is the way science should be conducted and I hope that it represents the future of cooperation between all parties concerned. Dave
