DJ Cravens <[email protected]> wrote: That is not what I want to hear..... >
You do not want to hear that the cell will go out of control and melt? It will though, whether you want to hear that or not. It has already melted. I do not understand what you have in mind here. Nature allows us to do some things and not others. We have to work with what nature allows, not what we would wish for in an ideal universe. As long as we are wishing, I wish there was a form of cold fusion that directly produced electricity. That would sure be convenient! Now tell me: what was the point of my wishful thinking? What purpose does it serve, to wish for things we cannot have? Obviously with more engineering R&D a self-sustaining Rossi reactor could be made. This is just a matter of engineering. It would cost a great deal of money and time. It would be a distraction. It would not prove anything the present test does not prove. Mary Yugo would insist it is fake. Robert Park would ignore it. Why bother? Just use a different watt meter next time and all remaining questions vanish as surely as they would with a self-sustaining reactor. > that is what I am working toward. > standalone and a cup of tea for NI.... > A standalone cup of tea would be marvelous, but far less convincing than the test conducted by Levi et al. it would also be much convincing proof that the effect can be made into a practical source of energy. - Jed
