Your hunch amounts to overwhelming evidence? Rossi is public figure? You think you can accuse someone of fraud and not be subject to possible suit?
As a practicing lawyer, your comments make me shudder! Ransom Sent from my iPhone On Jun 3, 2013, at 9:37 PM, Jouni Valkonen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote: >> In my opinion, people should not bring up fraud unless they have specific >> and compelling evidence. I do not know what the law (e.g., US law) says >> about the permissible boundaries for discussing possible fraud in a public >> forum, but we should not recklessly put this one at risk. > > It is not a problem. Both Levi and Rossi are public figures. E.g. Obama does > not sue you if you are accusing him a liar from false basis or that you think > that Obama has secretly visited Mars in 1980's. > > For me the evidence is overwhelming against Rossi and if Rossi is a scammer, > this makes also Levi as a partner. Note that this does not imply that Rossi > and Levi are doing something that is criminal ― they are just making money! > > Note also that evidence is only for me overwhelming. This means that my > opinion is strong. However I do not claim that I have positive evidence for > the fraud. It is just that my hunch is pointing towards scam. > > ―Jouni > >
