What he said. I whacked, unread, those forty odd, and here I am reading
and deleting, one-by-one, forty or so responses. Enough of this.
Ol' Bab
On 6/4/2013 12:15 PM, Robert Ellefson wrote:
> ... at what point does this incessant (IMO) kind posting behavior considered
> a nuisance and hindrance to on-going Vortex discussions? Now, if Cude is
> genuinely making a good contribution I'll have nothing more to say on
> this matter. But it would be interesting to hear a consensus on how much
> of a genuine contribution Cude is allegedly making - from other Vort members.
Now that I am subscribed to the list, I have the ability to filter people
such as Cude directly. However, there is no reasonable means of filtering
the large volume of useless responses to his postings. So, as when I read
the vortex web archives only, I am left to scan for names I recognize
that I
suspect may have something to contribute through the noise. This is
tedious
and fundamentally error-prone. The result is that I typically delete
en masse
the majority of related discussions. I don't
Because I quickly elected to simply ignore pseudo-skeptics such as Cude,
I cannot make specific claims as to the contents of his posts, only
that I do
not care to read them. However, I can claim that his posts are in
fact quite
disruptive to the flow of discussion and hence to the purpose of this
list.
If I were moderating this list, I would not tolerate it.
-Robert
