That is a description, not a rule. If it were a rule, we could enforce it. I
know all about freedom of speech and openness and all that. But I really don't
think that it applies here in a world were everyone can say anything anywhere.
LENR is a FACT. We should be trying to deal with LENR+, not skeptopaths.
10 years ago I was in a lot of health forums. I learned the hard way that
there really are skeptopaths; it really is an illness. I hope to avoid them
here.
Roger
> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 18:59:58 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Newbie
> From: hohlr...@gmail.com
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Roger B <rogerbi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > I have been a lurker for a short while, but I figured if skeptopaths are
> > allowed here, I should also be accepted.
> >
> > I think a simple way to deal with skeptopaths is to make a rule that no one
> > may be here who does not accept the reality of LENR. There are plenty of
> > forums where disbelievers in LENR are welcomed. This would leave the rest
> > of us to discuss LENR and LENR+ and Rossi et. al. in peace and good sense.
>
> Welcome. This is kinda covered in rule 2:
>
> "Vortex-L is a big nasty nest of 'true believers' (hopefully having
> some tendency to avoid self-deception,) and skeptics may as well leave
> in disgust."
>
