I guess I'm a little behind the curve. Joshua got banned anyways.
>From the other thread... On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not arguing for banning Joshua Cude. I'm saying he should be given a > timeout, to return in one day (if he wishes) but then he has an assigned > thread that he will be expected to babysit. The thread would be something > like "Joshua Cude Returns". Anyone can log onto that thread and point out > that Joshua is evading them on some other thread, or was proven > conclusively wrong, or has been engaging in sneering, or any other rule 2 > violation. Then Bill only has 1 place to look. > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The Wikipedia article was nonsense from start to finish, when I last >>>> checked it a few years ago. >>>> >>> ***And by doing nothing about dishonest debunkers, Vortex will become >>> the same. >>> >> >> I do not see the similarity. At Wikipedia, when they disagree with you >> they erase your remarks. They also ban you. I think banning people is a bad >> idea, as I said. But it is up to Bill. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
