I disagree about the win^4. Hurricanes are nature's way of transporting "excess" energy from the tropics away from the tropics. If your scheme worked, the energy would build up such that eventually a hurricane would develop that was too strong for your 100 planes to stop and would in fact be MUCH stronger than anything that we have ever seen before. The take away lesson here is don't mess with Mother Nature, particularly on that ginormous of a scale.
However, it might be possible to use this idea with fewer planes to guide the hurricane to dissipate in the North Atlantic so that there would be considerably less damage. This would be working with Nature, not suppressing Nature. On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Alan Fletcher > Wow!! The main stream media finally acknowledge Rossi !!! > > > Andrea to make landfall in Florida > < > http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/06/us/tropical-weather-andrea/index.html?hpt=hp_ > t1> > > > They mention it being hot and disruptive .. I guess they couldn't decide > between "Cold fusion" or LENR. > > LOL. But Andrea notwithstanding, there is a serious (fringe science) side > to > the possible interplay of tropical storm dynamics and hydrogen thermal > anomalies. > > Vortex storms - hurricanes and/or tornados are electrostatically driven to > some degree. The charge comes from triboelectrics (friction) caused by heat > and evaporation. Charge translates into the anomalous acceleration. > Electrical storms are common. > > Anyway - some time ago we talked about a possible remedy to nip a tropical > storm in the bud, so to speak, using Pentagon technology … which is > actually > available now. > > Circle the wagons, boys. Assuming that continually shorting-out the > pre-hurricane charge build-up over tens of hours, around the periphery of > any emergent Vortex would do the trick of throttling back the storm system > by depriving it of charge differential, then why not borrow the military > "Helladds" airborne laser defense system.... and circle the storm. > > http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technovel_darpa_lasers_050830.html > while using the airborne laser beams to continually ionize a conductive > path > to ground (or water) in order to cancel charge accumulation all along the > storm front? > > It requires hundreds of plane, and we can see the front from space - PLUS > this is win-win-win-win (if it works) and everybody is happy in the end. > The > military gets more lasers, the oil companies sell lots of aviation fuel to > keep hundreds of planes airborne, the citizens have less worry about storm > damages and more jobs are created while FEMA gets to do sit on their > collective arses and nothing productive, as usual. > > Probably too simple a solution to be implemented, and maybe the party in > power actually wants to have the occasional disaster, in order to keep the > populace from thinking about all the other problems, not to mention the > party not in power needs the opportunity to blame everything on the party > in > power. > > In the end - bureaucratic inertia. Get used to it. > > Jones > >
