On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> It seems to me if he was certain they were impossible he would >> have explicitly mentioned violation of conservation of momentum/energy >> since >> modern physics considers that impossible in no uncertain terms. >> > > > The three sections go into a bit of detail. The third section, on the > missing nuclear products, is quite long, and I would not be surprised at > all if he mentions conservation of momentum, which would be broken for the > rare d+d→4He+ɣ branch if there was no gamma. > > Eric > > The third section is titled "Concealed nuclear products". Notice he says concealed rather than non-existent which suggests to me he is considering the possibility, however improbable, that the products are present but have been disguised, altered or hidden somehow. However, if ,as you say, he is certain that CF is impossible because it violates the conservation of momentum why does he go through this exercise? Since certain key pieces of evidence are missing which would make the phenomena obey conservation of momentum, he is duty bound by his faith in the conservation of momentum to dismiss or explain away all the evidence as error or delusion. Harry
