Either Kim incorrectly quotes Huizenga's book or the second ( and more popular?) version misrepresents Huizenga's three miracles.
Somebody with a copy of Huizenga's book could this settle this issue quickly. Harry On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > Probbably Huizenga himself has used different variants, > this is like folklore. I confees I have not read the Huizenga > and Taubes books, have seen them when visting at Gene Mallove's > office in 1998 but I was not too interested- they were discussed over and > over. > Peter > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Peter, >> >> Kim says Huizenga's three miracles are: >> (1) suppression of the DD Coulomb repulsion (Gamow factor) * * >> (2) no production of nuclear products (D+D → n+ 3He, etc.) >> (3) the violation of the momentum conservation in free space >> >> In other places I have seen Huizenga three miracles written like this : >> (1) the mystery of how the Coulomb barrier is penetrated >> (2) the lack of strong neutron emissions >> (3) the lack of strong emission of gamma or x-rays >> see for example >> http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/Chubb93Editorial.pdf >> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/Theories/LiTheory.shtml#miracles >> >> >> The second set does not mention of violation of momentum conservation >> in free space. >> Which set is correct? >> >> Harry >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> *Prof. Yeong Kim interviewed*: a veteran finally gets optimistic following >>> a technological breakthrough. >>> Please see: >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/06/a-veterans-voice.html >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>> Cluj, Romania >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
