Jones,
Could we not argue that SR is proof of 4 spatial dimensions? The
Pythagorean relationship between v^2 and C^2 is evidence that the paradox
twins both exist in normal 3 space from their own local perspective but that
those 3 space frames are oriented differently AND "displaced" on another axis
as evidenced by contraction? We may not be able to turn our head in this ant
farm but with great energy we can turn the whole ant farm by pushing our frame
up to near luminal velocity..in another analogy I believe cavity suppression
bends the ant farm very locally in a cavity based on geometry instead of energy
intensive velocity. Perhaps there is a very narrow spatial dimension below
the plank scale which would be invisible to the physical world but still
provide an axis, about which 3 space is oriented, This axis would be in
parallel with the temporal axis as evidenced by the Twin paradox and
navigation on this axis would accelerate or retard the elapse rate of time
relative to normal 3 space.
Fran
_____________________________________________
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 11:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Helium from nowhere?
There is a decent case for the existence of four real (Euclidian) spatial
dimensions. Modern physics is a bit ambivalent on hyperspace, since space and
time are already unified in the four-dimensional "Minkowski continuum" called
spacetime. However, spacetime has no Euclidean 4th dimension - but many
theories depend on the reality of another spatial dimension (such as Dirac
reciprocal space).
According to NASA, based on observation and theory - when the Universe was
formed in the Big Bang, the resulting elemental matter which formed in
expanding spacetime was about three quarters hydrogen, one quarter helium, and
a few parts-per-billion of lithium (by weight). Everything else was de minimus.
Billions of years later, about 90% of this original matter converted into some
kind of dark matter. It no longer seems to exist in Euclidian space. No one
really knows what dark matter is - but it could simply related to the present
4-space location of the original primordial matter.
If so, then about ¾ of dark matter is dark hydrogen and ¼ is dark helium.
That is the required preamble to "Helium from nowhere" ... which could be an
relevant factor in some LENR experiments, but is generally ignored.
>From time to time the oddity of "spontaneous hydrogen" does come up for
>discussion. Many respected experimenters have reported the surprising
>appearance of hydrogen-from-nowhere in vacuum experiments. The most famous is
>from Sir J.J. Thomson who won the 1906 Nobel Prize in Physics for the
>discovery of the electron ... and for his work on the conduction of
>electricity in gases. He was the premiere expert on vacuum anomalies of an
>earlier era. JJ was convinced of the reality of spontaneous hydrogen.
Mainstream physics writes off much of what Thomson and others have claimed to
experimental error, but similar findings persist today, even with the best
equipment. Some of the stories have been cataloged here:
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2006/06/hydrogen_from_space_the_aether.html
At any rate, the point of all of this is not obvious so it should be stated: if
you believe that spontaneous hydrogen does indeed happen in a vacuum and
especially in vacuum arcs, and that it derives from a fourth spatial dimension
- then the lesser known implication is that "helium" from nowhere is also to be
expected.
Jones
