I'm amazed by the capacity of nay-believers to ignore evidence and imagine complicated hypothesis of fraud.
It seems that there's nearly nothing that could convince them. I launch an hypothesis analysis whether some events could be accepted or not : Hypothesis 1: Ecat swedish showcase Story: Hydrofusion install in a city a 1MW heat plant . the client pay for the heat only. they are happy. Electric bill is public. Nay-Believer: there is hidden wire, factory is too big to look for tricks... Me: hopeless, will never convince Hypothesis 2: LENR-cars across the world Story: LENR-Cars create Teslas S prototype with LENR recharger, and turn across the continents Nay-Believers: it is recharged at night, hidden wires, microwave or induction feeding... fuel cell hidden. Me: hopeless Hypothesis 3: LENR-drone by a LENR startup from EADS drone flying for month Story: a french startup install a LENR+turbine generator on a EADS E-fan plane , and make it fly as drone for months Nay-Believers: recharged by sun, by microwave, by laser, by fission nuke, by isotopic TEG Me: hopeless if you don't question your hypothesis, and question all on the others foundations, there is no hope. What would work... the tea kettle did not work, what can? commercial success ?
