Nassim Nicholas taleb predict that in Antifragile, in the chapter
"lecturing birds to fly", "history written by the losers".
http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/Triana-fwd.pdf

real innovation is done by tinkerers, practitioners, garage inventors,
engineers, with trial and error method...
and academic rewrite the history to say that they invented it, by the
theory to practice method.


2013/6/22 Eric Walker <[email protected]>

>
>
> "When Pons and Fleischmann first made claim of their 'results,' the least
> competent in science rushed to the scene and made it very difficult to sift
> wheat from chaff.  No one would publish their results in reputable
> journals, and the 'papers' they prepared were of such substandard quality
> that they were indistinguishable from promotional literature
> for homeopathic remedies and magnet motors.  We did our best to bring
> scientific scrutiny to bear on the multitude of claims that were being made
> by any electrical engineer or computer programmer that could get ahold of
> some palladium and a test tube, but they would not work with us.  It was
> not until 2015 that Caltech, Harwell and MIT were able to
> independently piece together some of the critical details that Andrea Rossi
> was unwilling to divulge that we first had any kind of scientific basis for
> 'solid-phase mediated fusion,' as the field is now known.  (Note that they
> found a COP of 2.54 rather than 2.6, as was initially claimed.)  Prior to
> the very difficult experiment that Caltech, Harwell and MIT were heroically
> able to carry out, solid-phase mediated fusion was the stuff of
> near-threshold events recorded in the spreadsheets of hobbyists playing in
> their garages.  We liken the critical transition to professional science to
> the transition of alchemy, in the middle ages, to chemistry, with the
> systematization of the scientific method.  The early tinkerers had a role
> to play, obviously, but now we can look to professional scientists to carry
> out a rigorous and systematic investigation and to publish quality results
> in mainstream scientific journals."
>
> Eric
>
>

Reply via email to