Hi John,
I think the problem is the "audience" you have chosen is one that is presently looking hard for substantive physical effects, especially in light of the criticism of LENR (where intuition has met with strong challenges) - yet what these images offer is more suggestive than substantive. You are apparently very sensitive to them, and others may think there "could be" something there, but would rather remain noncommittal. It there is some kind of inherent and measurable energy in an image, or type of image - and/or some connection to an aether field - then as the "inventor" of the effect - you probably would be wise to find out why it has the physical effect by implementing any kind of quantification - and then see if there is a statistical way to validate it. We have looked for and not seen a gravity effect, and there does not seem to be anything related to momentum, but since all images involve photons and reflectivity, etc - it is worth thinking about some kind of photonic test procedure. Jones From: John Berry Ok, Maybe no one is ready, since I have had zero testers give results positive or negative. But I want to give this a fresh chance due to apparent technical difficulties the first time, excuse my persistence. http://img802.imageshack.us/img802/7185/xens.png http://aethericsciences.net78.net/user_images/even%20better.png Open the image, and feel with your palm (hand flat with light tension on your skin) moving hand toward and away from the center of the image, feel for any sensation such as heat/warmth, cool or pressure, tingle or buzz etc... Also you might feel energy elsewhere, eyes, or on face etc... And you might feel nothing since it's just an image and logically an image can't have a physical effect, because, well they just don't. Of course if you do feel something then you can accept that as equally logical since everyone knows that protons are particles (or packets of electromagnetic disturbance) and the space is a sea of quantum waves and virtual particles etc.. But give your answer, positive, negative, or unclear/inconclusive (too little to call, but not quite nothing). Give your answer in private if you like. Or just refuse to look thorough my telescope because of what the church of science would say if they found out. But if so are you afraid of a negative result, or a positive one? John
