On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi John,**** > > ** ** > > I think the problem is the “audience” you have chosen is one that is > presently looking hard for substantive physical effects, especially in > light of the criticism of LENR (where intuition has met with strong > challenges) - yet what these images offer is more suggestive than > substantive. You are apparently very sensitive to them, and others may > think there “could be” something there, but would rather remain > noncommittal. > Yes, obviously my aim is to get something that is not subjective and is more substantial. I still believe that if a large enough % of people feel something convincing, then that has value to show that this is worthy more study. > **** > > ** ** > > If there is some kind of inherent and measurable energy in an image, or > type of image - and/or some connection to an aether field - then as the > “inventor” of the effect - you probably would be wise to find out why it > has the physical effect by implementing any kind of quantification - and > then see if there is a statistical way to validate it.**** > > ** ** > > We have looked for and not seen a gravity effect, and there does not seem > to be anything related to momentum, but since all images involve photons > and reflectivity, etc – it is worth thinking about some kind of photonic > test procedure. > Yes, but I would note that the method used here may be photonic, and hence the quantities are likely photonic, but these same principles can be applied to various other forms, for instance if a copper plated PCB was etched in such a form and electrical energy was applied, then the qualities would be somewhat different. So maybe rather than fit the detector to the energy, maybe I would be better to fit the energy to the detector. Alas it is always more tempting to increase the sensation I feel through experimentation than it is to take shots in the dark that the energy will cross over into changing some desired effect. Of course I could try and see if Kirlian photography (or updated versions) can detect an effect, but this sounds like something that would be ignored anyway. And inventing a detector to detect an energy I have also 'invented' sounds like asking to be ignored. What I am going to have to probably do is work the whole thing out myself into a genuinely useful and substantive effect, but sometime it is nice to see if by any chance there is an easier path. The last 12 or so people I have asked to feel these images (all first time, most all with no backgound in anything like this) all could feel something and most enough that they were quite surprised. But is that really enough? Even 100% of people might be insufficient to really gain any significant collaborators. John
