Its a good thing Peter Thiel et al don't know you worked at the same company as this guy.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:31 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > And this is the coolest damn water spout I have ever seen with a lightning > bolt down the middle. Do you know they still do not know what causes > lightning? > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:24 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Jim, >> BTW, I worked for the same company as this guy for 10 years @ Sandwell >> Engineering (I was in their Atlanta office but went/back & forth to >> Vancouver, BC) >> "Dr. Stephen Ramsay is a professional engineer and mathematician >> specializing in engineering meteorology and risk assessment with Sandwell >> Engineering, Vancouver, B.C." >> >> I understand the hot/cold air vortex concept. I really don't have much >> of an idea of the energy/efficiency balance. Their claim: >> “When the vortex is less than 20 meters in height, [generated power] is >> invisible,” he says. As the vortex size increases, the amount of energy >> produced increases exponentially, Michaud’s theory predicts." >> >> They need to prove they will get an exponential increase in energy. I >> don't necessarily agree with their theory. Mesoscale tornadoes are >> generated beneath strong jet streams rotating and pulling a strong vacuum >> from above and also generating gravitational waves in the atmosphere as >> predicted by Einstein and shown clearly over Moore, OK and Joplin, MO and >> During Hurricane Sandy. Here are a couple of pictures from my research, I >> have more on my blog >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Stewart >> darkmattersalot.com >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:35 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> See slide 19 of: >>> >>> http://vortexengine.ca/PPP/AVEtec_Business_Case.pdf >>> >>> Bottom line: >>> >>> If LENR doesn't pan out as an electrical generating system, Atmospheric >>> Vortex Engines are the next best thing. >>> >>> If LENR does pan out as an electrical generating system, Atmospheric >>> Vortex Engines are not only still hard to beat, at 300 mil/W capital cost, >>> 0 variable operating cost and 1mil/W fixed operating cost, but they can be >>> used with the larger centralized energy users (there will be _some_) to >>> relatively efficiently (up to 20%) cogenerate from the waste heat. >>> >> >> >
