People have explored this possibility and some people still think this
overlap exists. I once had this opinion as well. Now the evidence is
clear. Hot and Cold fusion are two separate and independent phenomenon
requiring entirely different mechanisms. Ironically, the initial
rejection was based on the belief that cold fusion was hot fusion.
When the expected radiation was not produced, the claim was rejected
because no neutrons meant no fusion. Now we know that cold fusion is
not hot fusion. It needs to be studied and understood separately.
Ed
On Jul 7, 2013, at 2:22 PM, H Veeder wrote:
I am not looking, but perhaps one should remain open to the
possibility.
Harry
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Edmund Storms
<[email protected]> wrote:
Perhaps by you. But this difference is clear to people who study the
two mechanisms. I suggest you consider this view is correct and not
waste time looking for a transition zone. :-)
Ed
On Jul 7, 2013, at 1:14 PM, H Veeder wrote:
Whether the realms of cold fusion and hot fusion are separated by
an abyss or are connected by transition zone like that which exists
between mountains and the prairies remains to be seen.
Harry
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:02 PM, blaze spinnaker <[email protected]
> wrote:
Yeah that Soininen patent reported gamma radiation..
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]>
wrote:
In LENR, sometimes gamma rays are produced.
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 2:59 PM, H Veeder <[email protected]>
wrote:
cold fusion can be distinguished from hot fusion by the three
"miracles"
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/Theories/TakahashiTheory.shtml#miracles
Harry
