Well, I think the issue is that a third party has not proposed coming in and doing a black box test. They seem open to that sort of thing as far as I can tell.
They may also be concerned about being accused of being frauds. Perhaps the data they have is so unbelievable, they know they will be attacked viciously unless the data is reported by impeccable third party researchers. Learning from Rossi's mistakes? They are good at that. :) At least they are presenting at iccf. More than can be said for Rossi.. On 2013-07-10, at 11:10 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sign an NDA, visit them and stop complaining! > > 1. They have not invited me. > > 2. I never sign NDAs. I do not want to hear any secrets. > > An NDA covering everything would defeat the whole purpose of the visit. When > I go to a laboratory, my purpose is to learn the facts and to report them to > the public as accurately as I can. Anything they want to keep secret, I do > not want to hear. Skip that part of the presentation. > > If Defkalion wished to, they could easily arrange a black box test for me or > for someone else that reveals the calorimetry without disclosing anything > about the nature of the reaction, the machine, or any industrial secrets. > That is what Rossi did in the recent tests reported by Levi. > > Rossi is one of the most secretive people around, but he understands what a > black box test is. I am sure Defkalion understands it too. Apparently they do > not want to do one. That makes them look bad. > > Ask yourself: What are they doing now? What, exactly, is the benefit of > having unknown outsiders publish fluff such as "on the order of 600°C"? On > the order of! They don't have a thermocouple? That's ridiculous. It is > unprofessional. It sounds like someone describing a fashion show in the > Huffington Post. > > - Jed >
