Re: [Vo]:Why "Cold Fusion" Has to Die

[Edmund Storms]

Mark, you are correct about many theories being proposed but you are  
wrong about there being no theory that explains the effect. I have  
described such a theory in print and will give a major talk about the  
model at ICCF-18. This model can explain all the observed behavior as  
well as how the e-cat works.  Naturally, this idea is too new for it  
to be generally understood or to be properly tested. Nevertheless, it  
is a huge step in the right direction that needs to be acknowledged.  
The phenomenon is not just defined by the conventional physics  
community, the skeptics, and by people who have not bothered to  
understand what is known. You have a responsibility to understand and  
report what is ACTUALLY known and understood. I hope you will take the  
time to do this.  This issue is too important for it to be given the  
usual trivial treatment generally applied by the popular press to most  
issues.

Ed
On Jul 15, 2013, at 4:52 AM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2013/07/15/why-cold-fusion-has-to-die/

[mg]