As Alan Fletcher said "Sounds even worse than a Rossi event." Rossi events don't "prove the existence of" anything significant. They "raise public awareness" and appear to have had no impact on *anything*. Oh, we can *speculate* about *invisible* impact, but the fact remains that there are no customers coming forth and saying that they have purchased a Rossi device, nor are there any changes in public policy nor even admitted behavior of stake-holding funding sources.
Due to centralization, we live in a very perverse authority structure that, even when vital interests are at stake, is impervious to all but very carefully crafted presentations. Rossi's behavior I can understand if he's willing to sacrifice share-holder opportunity in order to buy further discredit of centralized authority structure. But when you have 2 competitors racing for the market, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that we are dealing with "fools" -- not in the technical sense, but in the sense of dealing with the perverse realities of current authority structures. On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: > Because you cannot do it without having proved the existance of something, > that is, a high power reactor. So, you do both. > > > 2013/7/16 James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> > >> If the point of raising public awareness is political then what is the >> point of pursuing politics if not to change policy? >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> The difference it is that you wanted to change a policy. They want to >>> raise awareness about the existance of something. >>> >>> >>> 2013/7/16 James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> >>> >>>> You want to know what it takes to overcome political opposition from >>>> bureaucratic insiders to outside competition: >>>> >>>> Look this guy >>>> up<http://web.archive.org/web/20081212071704/http://www.geocities.com/jim_bowery/testimny.htm>. >>>> He seems to have some experience dealing with that sort of thing. Clue: >>>> Defkalion's approach to politics has a log way to go and there is no >>>> evidence they are pursuing the route they need to make it work. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Daniel Rocha >>>> <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> But politics is important in this business. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2013/7/16 James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>>> Public awareness works for politics. Market awareness works for >>>>>> business. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>>>> danieldi...@gmail.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>> danieldi...@gmail.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com >
