There have been a _lot_ of suggested techniques to make these public tests more convincing. One suggestion from the pseudonymous "GoatGuy", who will probably change the goal posts if the suggestion is taken, is bulk calorimetry: recirculating the cooling water with the bulk of it buffered in a highly insulated tank. This integrates the power in a way that is less prone to accumulating errors than is flow calorimetry. Of course, it also ignores the fact that temperature control is critical to the reactor stability so it may not be practical for this technology. You'd need temperature-driven variable flow-rate.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Mark Gibbs <[email protected]> wrote: > What do people expect these demos will show? What could make them > convincing or unconvincing? > > If you reply either publicly or privately, please let me know if I may > cite your name if I quote you. > > [mg] > > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]>wrote: > >> My dear friends. >> >> Tomorrow will take place the first public demo of Defkalion's Hyperion. >> Anticipating this Event, I have published today: >> >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/07/defkalion-is-re-defining-success-in.html >> re >> my vision about Defkalion's professional virtues >> and: >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/07/test-protocol-for-public-demo-test-code.html >> the >> essential protocol of the demo of Defkalion. >> I apologize for my lack of experience in publishing pdf. files on my >> Blogger blog, but anyway you will get the correct impression of this >> achievement. >> >> Please let me and my friends know about what you will learna nd conclude >> from these two demos and presentations >> Thank you! >> Peter >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > >
