Their natural behavior is for me the best evidence. Nelson during his own test concluded the same.
of course it is not enough for nay-believers who will only suicide when there is no shadow, and even... for hard skeptic, they should be very much interest, but keep some romm for doubt, because of the few shadows. for people who have to decide, and who can loose form inaction as much as from a scam, it is time to sign a NDA. if a French have signed, sure he did a test. We won't trust our mother for the change. 2013/7/25 Eric Walker <[email protected]> > Alan Fletcher quoted MFMP: > > We had the fortune to be in direct Skype chat contact with Mats Lewin >> during the experiment and it was definitely live, we were able to ask Mats >> to pose questions, challenges and do additional testing during the run and >> saw near real time responses including watching him respond to our requests >> > > This, together with the fact that the demo was many hours long, is an > interesting situation. People were able to send Mats Lewan a question, and > he could take steps to look into it. At least in theory, either > > - he would track down the piece of information, > - or he would be prevented from doing it for some reason (e.g., > "intellectual property"). > > Since the investigation can proceed in an iterative fashion, and there is > plenty of time to pursue it, skeptics have an opportunity to ask that > actions be taken, like moves on a chessboard. If Defkalion are faking, > they must either shift things around and change the fake, or they must > prevent Lewan from looking at something, or they must devise a very > sophisticated fake. With the information obtained from the last move, > observers can then come up with the next query. So presumably you could > get either to a checkmate (there's something obvious that is preventing > critical information from being disclosed) or you could get to a situation > where nothing is obviously amiss, even after looking into various details. > > This approach does not guarantee no funny business, but Defkalion would > have to be audacious and brave to submit to those rules if they are trying > to game things (watching the video right now, I see no indication that they > are). It would be nice if future demonstrations were to have this > interactive component, and skeptics were to come up with a kind of protocol > to rule out the simple fakes up front, requiring them to focus their > attention on more sophisticated ruses than cheese power. > > Eric > >
