Craig <[email protected]> wrote:
> The fact that they were able to > reproduce the reaction, and do it better than Rossi could do it two > years ago, tells us that they discovered a material that works, along > with Rossi, and Mills, and perhaps Miley and others. It is a replication > in a fundamental sense. I agree. It is a replication in the scientific sense, rather than by the standards of industry. (It may also be the latter. Perhaps Defkalion did see a sample of Rossi's material and they reverse engineered it.) > If a hundred different teams replicated this > nickel-hydrogen reaction using various different types of nickel and > hydrogen, there would be no more dissent over the reality of the effect. > Well, 200 groups replicated Pd-D cold fusion and there is still dissent. But I agree there should not be. Certainly the case for Ni-H has grown stronger. > The demonstration was really good. They ran a control run which showed > no effect. . . . I look forward to seeing it. It is a little ironic that the people here at the conference probably have the least information on this presentation this week. We are busy with other presentations and with the tour of the lab, which was very interesting! I am glad it was recorded. I hope it remains on file. - Jed
