On 07/24/2013 06:36 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > I think that a demonstration of this nature is valuable. I am pleased > they did it. But it is no substitute for the kind of test Levi et al. > did of Rossi's device. I mean Levi et al. used their own instruments; > they went back three times and improved the technique each time; they > spent several days; they used a video camera to be certain there was > no interference. That is much better proof than Defkalion can offer > with a single, 8-hour video test. >
It is a better test than the one that Levi and company performed. This is a complete and total, independent, replication of Rossi's method; even if they don't plan to write it up. Craig
