Well, yeah, I agree that it's an awesome thing but it took money out of my pocket.
On another thread.... Re: [Vo]:MFMP on a possible independent report of DGT's Hyperion<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=subject:%22Re%3A+%5BVo%5D%3AMFMP+on+a+possible+independent+report+of+DGT%27s+Hyperion%22> Joe Hughes<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=from:%22Joe+Hughes%22> Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:13:51 -0700<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=date:20130726> i tried to explain this very thing to blaze over on the above top secret forums a little over a month ago and encouraged him to join this mailing list to hear from some real experts in the field which is how he wound up here. i agree his tune has changed incredibly from the beginning which is an awesome thing but still waiting for him to admit that there is a clear and direct line from Rossi to DGT and Rossi deserves to be recognized for that despite his character flaws. Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: >DGT stole a page from Rossi's book on the Ni-H scientific side, now they're >stealing a page from his book on how to conduct business and promise >undisclosed future promises of independent university testing. > >I think they were working with Rossi and decided for themselves that the >guy was too mercurial and if a clown like him could find the secret, so >could they. Like someone sidling up to the Wright Brothers like Selfridge >(the first person to die in a Wright Brothers accident) and steal the IP. >That same approach was tried by no less an aeronautical luminary than >Langley when he finally realized how far behind he was in his research. > >http://books.google.com/books?id=XKaqfYxlsW8C&pg=PA96&lpg=PA96&dq=%22wright+brothers%22+++%22octave+chanute%22+smithsonian+langley+cheeky&source=bl&ots=uR3Rqkkfb9&sig=Sffd3uvfLAlm28sdKgke1cA-g-0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ATDzUYC_HOffiAKCr4HgDA&ved=0CEUQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22wright%20brothers%22%20%20%20%22octave%20chanute%22%20smithsonian%20langley%20cheeky&f=false > >
