- Take this off list. This is my last response on this thread. Enjoy the last word.
- No. I don't have to convince you of anything. I believe Impact Factor is valid and that's all that matters to me. - Thomson Reuters is an accurate source of Impact Factors. Most journals will give you their factor if you ask. - You and I both know the devils are always in the details. We lived and breathed that on Intrade. Why are you quibbling? - To be clear - I will bet someone who thinks ~5% chance Rossi is real that they're wrong (assuming they give me ~20 to 1 odds because they're so confident he's a fraud) I also will bet someone who thinks 50% Rossi is not at fraud that they're wrong (at 1:1 odds). Let me rephrase this in Intrade terms, I will go long at 50 cents and short at $5 the contract that rossi is real. Got it? - Educational to you and I, absolutely, I really really doubt anyone else cares. Again, this is my last word on this. I'll engage you off list, but on list you will get the last word, whatever nonsense you dream up.
