Thank you for the details. On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:09 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
it may also explain the Ni results, though I don't think it would explain > why > 61Ni is unreactive. > Of the different things we've heard over the past few days, I'm inclined as follows: - High temperatures in the nickel/hydrogen system -- important (the higher the better). - Debye temp -- correlation? Coincidence? Something that was specifically observed? - Unreactive 61Ni -- misdirection? Offhand speculation? (I say this in part because I recall reading that it would be very difficult to isolate this isotope from the others in order to examine its properties.) Eric
