>From a very quick look, I do not see nanowires on the surface of the particles.
I do not see the suspension of the particles on a matrix to expose all the particle surface areas to the clusters produced by the spark plug(s). The particles should be maximum of 5 microns in diameter with 2 microns of nanowire covering. The majority of the particles should be 5 microns total including the nanowire covering. The particles should be surrounded by spark production. Can these changes be made? On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]>wrote: > I would love to expand the test matrix, and plan to do so. My biggest > problem at the moment is my system is completely manual. I have to build > it, and operate it with close attention. I need to automate the system so > that I can multiply my time. I am also transitioning from doing the > experimentation at work (partly) to doing it totally from home (I retired > in June). > > Thank you for the suggestion. > > Bob > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Charles Francis <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On the off-chance, you might try adding potassium carbonate to your mix, >> given the info mentioned here:**** >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg84258.html**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Potassium carbonate (and sodium bicarb?) also seem to behave >> energetically in the video shown here:**** >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg84774.html**** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* Bob Higgins [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* 03 August 2013 02:11 >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [Vo]:A paper about my LENR work with carbonyl Ni**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Greetings fellow Vorts,**** >> >> ** ** >> >> While at ICCF, I expressed my feelings that there would be no controlling >> patent on the material that makes LENR work. There has been so much open >> speculation that has now all become part of prior art. Additionally, >> without a theory, you will not be able to identify the workarounds and any >> claims are likely to be easily worked around in the end. I expect the >> valuable patents to be on the apparatus that follows - the devices that do >> the work and meet peoples needs. To help make that a self-fulfilling >> prophesy, I decided some time ago to openly share what I am doing in Ni-H >> materials.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> At ICCF I had the opportunity to show slides of my Ni-H LENR work to many >> people. A common request was for something written about my work. So while >> traveling home I put together a paper describing my work. It is not peer >> reviewed and I would be happy to get comments back. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> The paper is on my Google drive at:**** >> >> ** ** >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5Pc25a4cOM2Qzl0WC1ldW1MMUU/edit?usp=sharing >> **** >> >> >> Please let me know if this doesn't work. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> I learned a number of lessons in this phase and I am currently working on >> the next pass of improvements to my test system in particular.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Regards, Bob Higgins**** >> > > > > -- > > Regards, > Bob Higgins >
