It will be important for DGT to determine what about their sparks is causing the enhanced LENR so that they can maximize the benefits.
They know an have stated it publically; it is Rydberg matter which are nanoclusters- see superatoms in wiki. On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > The spark plugs produce potassium and hydrogen nanoparticles. > > A picture of the DGT micro particles can be found in Kim's presentation > will show the nanowires. > > The nanowires will crack the H2 into H. > > See > > > Hot Electrons Do the Impossible - Plasmon-Induced Dissociation of H2 > > > > http://www.princeton.edu/mae/people/faculty/carter/EAC-267.pdf > > > > > > I don't know for sure, but your Curie temperature might be way to high. > You should check. > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Sorry Axil, I don't suspend my particles in a separate matrix as does >> Defkalion. My technique is more like that of Rossi. >> >> The spark plugs are not required to see the LENR. Neither Rossi's >> original eCat nor his latest HotCats have any sparkplugs or RF excitation. >> Reports suggest that they are not required for the effect. I do not believe >> DGT's sparkplugs are causing plasma effects that extend into the powder. >> The mean free path of monatomic H in high pressure H2 is only microns. DGT >> does not appear to apply enough power to the sparkplugs to totally ionize >> the H2 contents. There could be excitation of their reactor as an RF >> cavity, but it is not strongly excited. The sparkplug could also be >> operating as an acoustic transducer driving an acoustic resonance in DGT's >> reactor. It will be important for DGT to determine what about their sparks >> is causing the enhanced LENR so that they can maximize the benefits. If it >> is RF cavity resonance, then there is no need for the spark - just drive >> with RF at the right frequency matched into the cavity. >> >> Do you know this about the nanowires from your own experiments? I think >> this is bunk. The nanowires would melt pretty quickly at the temperatures >> we are talking about and particularly with the local heating at the NAE. I >> noted in my paper that there are Ni dendrites on my powder, but I don't >> believe they are the NAEs. At best, they may be useful for H2 cracking. It >> was just noted. >> >> What do you mean, "surrounded by spark production"? Again, is this a >> report of your first hand experience? >> >> Please stop saying things as if they are certain unless you have first >> hand evidence that they are. >> >> Bob >> >> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> From a very quick look, I do not see nanowires on the surface of the >>> particles. >>> >>> I do not see the suspension of the particles on a matrix to expose all >>> the particle surface areas to the clusters produced by the spark plug(s). >>> >>> The particles should be maximum of 5 microns in diameter with 2 microns >>> of nanowire covering. The majority of the particles should be 5 microns >>> total including the nanowire covering. >>> >>> The particles should be surrounded by spark production. >>> >>> Can these changes be made? >>> >>> >> >
