Peter, why do you write about subjects that you know nothing about?
You obviously have not read or understood what I propose. You have not
asked questions or discussed this with me. You make statements that
have no relationship to what I have proposed or even to general
knowledge about the subject. Please, if you want to be a spokesman for
the field, at least learn something about the subject you are
Indeed, I find your approach to be very common in this field. People
reach conclusions about cold fusion without any knowledge of what is
known about the subject or even what is accepted in conventional
science. I can understand why conventional scientists think the
people who believe CF is real are deluded. If I had not studied what
is known and seen the effect myself, I would be one of them. Several
people have remarked to me just how low the standards are in this
field. We need to do better.
On Aug 19, 2013, at 7:49 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:
Please read, criticize, and improve the ideas published here:
Believe me, I am sincere and serious here, and it is not a case of
Dr. Peter Gluck
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "CMNS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to cmns+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to c...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cmns.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.