Axil,
You discuss the destruction and reformation of NAE over a finite period of time. Do you think that there is some negative feedback mechanism in effect which forces the new formations to match the old ones that have been destroyed? It seems logical that a process that does not have a direct connection between production and destruction of NAE would proceed to either thermal run away or ultimate cool down. I suppose that a process might originate where elevated temperature results in that destruction being enhanced, particularly in the hot spots. The question is: What keeps the process in balance according to your hypothesis? Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Aug 20, 2013 10:23 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment LENR is driven by a specific topologythat directs electrons into the special motions and concentrations which resultin the LENR reaction. Cracks are a good example of this topology inthat through the discontinuity of the lattice that a crack provides, dipolemotion meets a boundary condition that forces electrons to follow a circularpath as a vortex electron currents forms. This dislocation of dipole motion mustoccur at the surface of a metal at the boundary between the metal a dielectricisolator. The downside of a permanent latticestructure like a crack is that it will deteriorate over time due to the stressesplaced on its topology as nuclear reactions occur in and around this boundarylocation. The crack will erode over time and thespecial conditions that cause the electrons to behave in this special way willno longer be preserved over extended time. But discontinuities in dipole movementwill also occur between nano-particles and micro particles. These discontinuities will be continuallyreformed and dispersed in a dynamic process as the particles float and bumparound in the turbulent motion of a hot hydrogen atmosphere. These nanoparticles will also bedestroyed by nuclear activity, but that can be occasionally rebuilt out of thecondensation process after the plasma stage produced by a hot heater element ora spark discharge. In this way, the NAE, is continuallyrebuilt at a fixed rate that exactly counters the rate of destruction caused inthese particles by nuclear activity. The effective LENR reaction is a fluid processof continual destruction and renewal that any solid structure cannot duplicate. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: Terry, the problem is psychological, not scientific. Understanding CF requires a change in perspective, which is hard for many people to do. You need to look at the system in which the nuclear reaction occurs from the perspective of the assembly of atoms, i.e. like a chemist does. The chemical system os constructed by interaction of the electrons and this interaction has very clear rules. Any change required to initiate a nuclear reaction will be communicated to this assembly and cause changes before the change will be experienced by the nucleus. That process provides the basic limitation to any mechanism proposed to occur in the lattice itself. In other words, to cause a nuclear effect, the chemical structure will also be affected in ways that will stop the nuclear process. This is how a chemical system is known to behave based on centuries of experience by chemists and by examining material over geological time. A change in perspective is REQUIRED before a person can fully appreciate the role of the chemical system. That is why a condition must be created outside of the rules that apply to the chemical system. The region INSIDE a crack provides this environment. Events occurring in this region would not affect or be affected by the chemical structure, hence could form a condition able to initiate a nuclear reaction. This is a very basic insight that cannot be "falsified" in the usual way. It requires a change in perspective to be evaluated. This situation is similar to how the relationship between the Sun and Earth was once explained, A change in perspective was required before the correct analysis could be done. Before this change in perspective occurred, very convincing mathematical analysis showed that the Sun circled the Earth, as was obvious to any casual observer. The tools available at the time could not falsify this concept. Ed On Aug 20, 2013, at 7:02 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Sunil Shah <s.u.n....@hotmail.com> wrote: Ed, A long time ago, in Solid State Physics, I read about various types of Dislocations in crystals (grains). Are they the NAEs? They move with applied/internal stress/pressure. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dislocation Wikipedia has a good article on defects in crystals: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystallographic_defect But many think that no defect is required in the crystal structure for LENR. There are strong arguments for both but, as yet, I have not seen one that was demonstrably falsifiable with today's tools and technology.
