On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:15 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> ROFL!

Call me cynical if you wish but here's the real story:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/1/curl-obamas-2014-calculation-lets-have-war/

"The first rule for President Obama: It’s all about 2014. The second
rule for President Obama: See Rule No. 1.

Make no mistake: The president couldn’t care less about the plight of
Syrians, the 1,500 gassed to death — including nearly 500 children.
It’s all about 2014. Win the House, reign supreme.

Consider this: Mr. Obama made his dramatic Rose Garden statement
Saturday — then headed to the golf course. Congress has no plans to
cut short its 30-day vacation, and the president did not call
lawmakers back. So much for urgency.

The conventional wisdom is, as usual, wrong. Losing the congressional
vote won’t be an embarrassment for the president, as all the talking
heads are still parroting. A loss would be a double win. First,
because a “No” vote would allow the foreign policy neophyte to walk
away from his blundering “red line” declaration on chemical weapons
(“I wanted to go in, but Congress said no”). And second, should
Republicans who voted for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars now oppose
Syria, the president would be armed with clear “evidence” that their
opposition is purely political.

Keep in mind: This president knows no way to campaign other than to
blame others. He’ll batter Republicans for all of 2014 as
obstructionists should they be the reason the effort fails."

<more>

Reply via email to