Jones,

Since Brillouin is actively seeking funding and cites collaboration with
SRI, wouldn't SRI be legally liable if the claims are untrue?

BTW, don't forget Godes offered an open invitation to inspect his lab
and measurements earlier.  That may not be possible now due to trade
secret protection.

-- Lou Pagnucco

Jones Beene wrote:
> From: [email protected]
>
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy Interview
>
>
>
> Godes focus on theory make me feel cautious.
>
> anyway COP of 2 have been tested by SRI, that is the only serious claim I
> am
> aware of...
>
>
>
> Whoa. That is NOT information which is coming from SRI.
>
>
>
> AFAIK - SRI has never reported seeing gain in the Brillouin testing.
>
>
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to