Go for it! I hope for success.
Depending on what is driving the current errors, your tech could be very
useful right now, because what's needed, over a day, is more the trends
than the absolute measurement.
Your device with a daily calibration against a conventional "stick"
would perhaps give really useful results, even if the tech's current
accuracy never get bettered.
Ol' Bab
On 10/26/2013 12:59 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
Ol' Bab,
Beg to differ: our noninvasive tech would allow you to test 100 times a day
if you wanted, without ANY pain, ever, and for pennies/test. The device
would cost a third of what you spend on test-strips each year, and it'll
last for 3 to 5 years; do the math...
-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: David L Babcock [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 6:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]: ATTENTION: request for expertise...
Beg to differ: We are having a mad desire for CHEAPER blood testing.
$1.20/stab is too much at 3 to 4 per day. Medicare only covers 2.
The pain? Very little, often none.
Ol' Bab
On 10/25/2013 1:15 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
I ran across this article which might be of interest:
http://www.pddnet.com/news/2013/10/measuring-blood-sugar-light
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
<[email protected]> wrote:
There are now 366 million diabetics in the world, and they have been
in need of a truly painless way to measure their blood sugar. You
could be one of the keys to solving the challenges which make this a
reality for them...
Thanks for your time...
Now back to your regularly scheduled E-Cat frustration!
:-)
-Mark Iverson
