The review was genuinely nasty and there is no pleasing someone like this. I did look over the photon comment and reviewed my writing in this section. I changed the coordinate system to spherical and I showed, clearly, that the wavelength in conjunction with the charge of the jumping electron produces the energy of the photon.
1. 094 million meters per second = freq times wavelength Where the frequency equals the frequency of the emitted photon. The wavelength in conjunction with the charge of the jumping electron equals the energy of the photon. I am glad that the nasty review made me rewrite this section. An explanation for the duality of particles and wave is an accomplishment enough. It better be perfect. Things like calling me a lair because I knew Planck s constant reflects only on the reviewer. I will just walk away from the comment stating, "This work, like all others, stands of the shoulders of giants." Good can come from adversity. The last time that this happened a reader pointed out that in order achieve a velocity of one million meters per second that the electron must pick up energy. Energy is conserved inertial mass is not. The rewrite now shows that the strong gravitomagnetic field during the quantum jump is associated with the non-conservation of inertial mass. Harsh reviews only make my work better. Stupid rants run off of my back like water on a duck. Frank Znidarsic -----Original Message----- From: fznidarsic <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]>; rvargo1062 <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, Oct 26, 2013 9:58 am Subject: Got a nasty review There are some interesting ideas here. I guess it could be possible that he got a couple things right, it is not likely though. It seems to me if cold fusion was really this successful there would be a lot more people working on it. I one thing that is completely obvious to me is that all of the math that this guy does is completely meaningless. He used a series of equations completely out of their context that made relationships that were nonsensical. It is ridiculous to model a photon as a capacitor. Photons have no charge, yes a positive and negative component, but no electrical charge. My feeling that that this book would be a waste of time to read, and that it was written by a liar. I know that he used Planck's constant to find the transitional velocity and not the other way around. If he could show us a way to derive his transitional velocity that did not use Planck's constant I would believe him. Until then please don't waste your time on this nonsense like I did. ......................
