There are some interesting ideas here. I guess it could be possible that he got a couple things right, it is not likely though. It seems to me if cold fusion was really this successful there would be a lot more people working on it. I one thing that is completely obvious to me is that all of the math that this guy does is completely meaningless. He used a series of equations completely out of their context that made relationships that were nonsensical. It is ridiculous to model a photon as a capacitor. Photons have no charge, yes a positive and negative component, but no electrical charge.
My feeling that that this book would be a waste of time to read, and that it was written by a liar. I know that he used Planck's constant to find the transitional velocity and not the other way around. If he could show us a way to derive his transitional velocity that did not use Planck's constant I would believe him. Until then please don't waste your time on this nonsense like I did. ...................... Cold fusion is real and we don't need reviews like this. The math is correct. He did not get the photon model. It clealys says that the transitional velocity is the product of frequency and velocity. The frequency is that of the emitted photon and the wavelength IN COMBINATION WITH THE ELECTRIC CHARGE OF THE ELECTRON gives the energy of the of the photon. In combination the model produces both the wave and particle like properties of matter. I do produce Planck's constant from a fundamental analysis where I sent the velocity of sound in the nucleus equal the velocity of the transnational state. I make no claim that I did not know Planck's constant before I did this. Anyway he gives all one star reviews. Frank
