I don't see it. They already have http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyroelectric_fusion neutron generators (published in Nature) which sound pretty cheap to make.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:14 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > What's significant would be highly reproducible gamma rays from a > relatively inexpensive device. Replication of the experiment would then be > done by grad students whose advisers were young enough in 1989 to not have > placed their own reputations in a noose at the end of a very long rope. > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I would say that the detected radiation is NOT extraordinary. Dr. >>> Storms published a paper on his measurements of radiation from LENR >>> experiments. . . . >>> >> >> You mean it is not unexpected in a cold fusion reaction. That's right. >> There are many reports of gamma rays in the literature, from Iwamura and >> others. Gamma rays have been sporadic and unpredictable. I do not know of >> any that appear on demand. I hope these come from the vasty deep when you >> do call for them. >> >> (When you "invoke" them, as we say in the programming biz.) >> >> Mark Gibbs may have the impression that it is "not extraordinary" meaning >> "not significant" or "not proof of a nuclear reaction." >> >> - Jed >> >> >
