Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote:
> No. I think you're caught up in some sort of conspiracy mindset loop. I > think there are a lot of people that want to believe but have burned by too > many measurement errors. > There have not been many measurement errors. I'll bet you can't list more than five. > However, there is a pattern of something. The question is what's > causing it and can it be scaled up reliably and safely. > Obviously it can, since it has been. > Why is this interesting and the previous 14,000 similar experiments not >> interesting? This is not especially dramatic or clear-cut. >> >> > It's interesting because Toyota is particularly credible. > Are you suggesting that Los Alamos, China Lake, the ENEA or SRI are not credible? - Jed
