It remind me Bo Hoistad answering Pomp&Eriksson "paper". the most shocking is that Wikipedia admin who are very strict on the quality, swallow it like my daughter swallow chocolate milk, and refuse to publish the rebuttal by Bo Hoistad on ibtimes.
pathetic 2013/12/7 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> is there any credible critic by someone who have proven an artifact , >> published it, and that this artifact explain many possible positive results >> ? >> > > Not that I am aware of. There are only a handful of skeptical papers that > even attempt to do this. Here is the best known one. Judge for yourself: > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmanreplytothe.pdf > > - Jed > >
