Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't see a any criticism of Piantelli's experimental procedure in the > paper you provided. > The critique is of a Ni bar experiment performed by Focardi, Habel, and Piantelli. The technique is the same. Others including McKubre have critiqued the technique for similar reasons, although I do not recall they published.
So by default, the proof I provided stands true and conclusive. > By default? By default you have read every paper in the literature and talked to McKubre and every scientist who has discussed this work? How did you do that, by ESP? You do not know of everything in the literature, or everything said at various conferences. Neither do I, but evidently I heard some things you missed out on. There is no "default" here, and the answer is not an absolute yes or no. Piantelli is not that well established. He has not been independently replicated, so strictly speaking, nothing has been established. When 3 to 5 other researchers have confirmed the heat and the transmutations, then we will know with confidence the results are real. Nobody wins by default in experimental science. Everyone has to play through to the end. - Jed
