Well Mr. Franks bailed preemptively. For anyone else whose interested: Oriani, Excess Heat, Fusion Technology: http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/OrianiRAcalorimetr.pdf
Morrison-Fleischman debate about Fleischman's published calorimetry in Physics Letters: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmanreplytothe.pdf On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: > Please don't unsubscribe Mr. Franks. Your tact is unparalleled and would > surely be missed. > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:40 AM, John Franks <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> What is "wrong with the data" Mr. Franks? Specifically the Excess Heat >>> data. What artifacts are present in the calorimetry? Point out to me the >>> peer reviewed critiques of researchers' calorimetry that have stood the >>> test of time. >>> >> >> Wow! Was it you claiming one group had 100% repeatability or another >> 70-80%. If that is the case, why are you arguing with me? >> >> Don't bring nonsense complaints that no theory can account for the >>> effect. Who demanded a theory right away for superconductivity? How about >>> excess heat coming off radium in early 20th century? Show me how the heat >>> measurements are wrong. >>> >> >> Silly rabbit. They had something working. (see my first response above). >> >> >>> I asked you this in the your orphaned thread on recombination, which you >>> quickly abandoned. I pointed out to you that the "Big 3" objections >>> (recombination, stirring, cigarette lighter effect) had all been accounted >>> for and answered between 1989 and 1994. >>> >> >> If you are quoting stuff from that long ago, where is the monograph. >> Where are the graduate level courses at top institutions teaching this as >> you seem to regard it as common knowledge. >> >> >> You people are not scientists, or even engineers. You are journalists, >> activists, the awkward squad who mistake shouting, posturing, getting >> "liked" on facebook or youtube as the process of doing science. >> >> All I have to report, as ever, is that Cold Fusion is a dead subject full >> of wannabes, the mentally ill and geriatrics, since no self-respecting >> young person would waste time learning useless "knowledge" in this subject. >> > >
