Did Rossi ever clarify what he meant by the word "explode" in purely mechanical terms? I mean forget about "release of radiation outside the reactor housing" for the moment.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote: > Jed Rothwell > December 27th, 2013 at 4:13 PM > > Hi. You wrote: > “1- within March 2014 I think will be completed the first part of the long > term validation and the results will be published positive or negative as > they might be.” > Do you mean the long-term validation performed by ELFORSK? They announced > this after they published the first study. I look forward to reading it. > > - - - > Andrea Rossi > December 27th, 2013 at 6:54 PM > > Jed Rothwell: I mean the third indipendent party validation. I think they > are financed by Elforsk, and I am honoured of the fact that Elforsk is > investing the money of their shareholders to indagate our work. But, > please, consider that we have no connection at all with Elforsk, so I am > not sure about my answer. I am sure of the fact that the long term test is > made by the third indipendent party and the publication will be made on a > peer reviewed magazine hopefully around March. By the way: I made you a > promise, you know which, and I don’t forget my promises. I wish you a 2014 > successful also for your informatic profession: they told me you are a > strong-force informatic. Warm Regards, A.R. > - - - > > Hank Mills > December 27th, 2013 at 7:34 PM > > Dear Andrea, > > What happens if you do not apply power again once you put the reactor in > to self sustained mode? Do the reactions try to run away or will they fade > over time? With at least some of your previous reactors, if you did not > apply power every so often the reactors would run away. However, in one > test the data showed when the input power was cut off the reactions > gradually faded over time. > > - - - > Andrea Rossi > December 27th, 2013 at 7:56 PM > > Hank Mills: > If we give too much energy to the reactor the temperature raises above the > controllability limits and the reactor explodes. We must maintain the drive > below this limit, and it is what we are learning to do, trying to reach a > controllability level at the highest temperature possible, because the COP > raises exponentially with the operation temperature. The apparatus is made > by two well separated components, the activator ( “mouse”) and the energy > catalyzar ( “Cat”). Now we have a mouse with a COP above 1 and a Cat with a > COP with zero energy consumption. If the Mouse excites the cat too much, > the cat gets wild and explodes. We must not risk to reach this level. We > have seen explode hunderds of reactors now, this way. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > - - - > Herb Gillis > December 27th, 2013 at 8:52 PM > > Dr. Rossi: > Can you elaborate on how serious an explosion you are talking about? When > you say you have seen hundreds of reactors explode I am sure you must > appreciate that word (“explode”) does not sound very good out of > appropriate context. Do these explosions involve release of radiation > outside the reactor housing? > Kind Regards; HRG. > - - - - > > Andrea Rossi > December 27th, 2013 at 9:13 PM > > Herb Gillis: > Useful comment. > The explosions, or destructive tests, are made in controlled modes, in > proper lab, with due control of the radiations made by proper > instrumentation. I cannot give further information about these data, but we > need destructive tests to find the safety limits within which the E-Cats > can work in a stabilized operation. Obviously,no ionizing radiations are > released outside the safety box in which the reactor is destructed: by the > way, just behind the walls of the box there are my Team and ME. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > - - - - > Andrea Rossi > December 28th, 2013 at 8:48 AM > > Giuliano Bettini: > Yes, the work is promising, but let’s wait the publication to read the > consolidated results. So far I must repeat that the output could be > negative, the validation work is not completed: never assume you won until > the whistle of end game has not been blown. Anyway: now we will estabilish > the limits of the allowable excitation with series of destructive tests, > then the control engineers will design the final version of the control > system for the new limits of the temperature of the high temperature E-Cats > ( Hot Cats). > Warm Regards, > A.R. > >
