More on the Kibble boson.
There was a feeble attempt at New Year's humor (yesterday)
in introducing a hypothetical transitory particle for gain in LENR, which
can be called a "Kibble boson", named after Tom Kibble, who was a
co-discoverer of the particle or field which has been so much in the News of
late - and since Peter Higgs himself gets waaaay too much credit and his 6
pals get almost none.
I guess it's a matter of convenience in that naming, but
it's not fair.
However, due to the response of private email to the prior
post, this detail on how the precise mass of 126-126 GeV can be seen as a
reality in low energy experiments, the endeavor has now turned into a more
serious pursuit.
This is especially relevant in the context of the special
long-lived unstable isotopes of barium/cesium/xenon etc. at this mass level
- several of which can give off (in decay) what is about the maximum amount
of energy that could go undetected in a reactor (no gamma, no neutron and
the isotope transmutes back and forth between the various hosts). It is a
nice fit and this "coincidence" of having a broad area of mass-energy with
many identities points the way towards some obvious applications which
derive from a base-level field influence which is now becoming
understandable.
The Kibble boson could be most apparent as a field
influence, and perhaps parts of its influence was formerly identified with
the zero point field. Which is to say, given the formalism, that the Kibble
is probably related to a field in five-dimensions - which does not shows up
in 3-space as a unique influence, but does show up in a range of mass-energy
equivalence in condensed matter. IOW - It is becoming predictable and
useful.
The kibble field would influence matter when the mass of an
elemental nucleus within its spectrum is resonantly stimulated - and the
mass of 134-barium is apparently identical to the Kibble, as is 134-xenon
and both are composite bosons. Lo and behold ... look closely at what
happens with these related isotopes in certain circumstances and we find the
rare and fabulous 135m-barium isotope. Perhaps no other isotope is more
desired for weapons R&D than those which come with an "m". But the Pentagon
has dibs on it, so we will move on.
First of all, notice that an isotope within a mass range of
134-135 amu (125-126 GeV) can be found in many different elements (!!!)
depending on the lifetime cutoff: barium, xenon, cesium, iodine, lanthanum
and tellurium. All of these have been seen in LENR experiments. That range
of cross-identify for one specific level of mass-energy is somewhat unique
in the periodic table, but that anomalous stability cannot yet be pinned to
the Kibble (Higgs) field in a proven way ... (good chance of that happening
however.)
Anyway the main purpose of this post is say that YES - we
may indeed find that a relic of the Kibble field plays a strong role in LENR
in 2014, but all frivolity aside - let's NOT use the old name. To the degree
that we will be the innovators who describe this applications for this
field, we owe no duty to mainstream fizzix- to keep their old name ... until
and unless they first come around with the mea culpa and recognize the
reality of LENR and their 25 years of semi-official dishonesty.
Jones
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
